How to Appeal an LTB Order to the Divisional Court
The filing steps and deadlines for a Divisional Court appeal.
The filing steps and deadlines for a Divisional Court appeal.
An appeal to the Divisional Court from an LTB order is generally limited to a "question of law," not a general disagreement with how a Board member weighed the evidence or decided the facts. This is a significant limitation that catches many tenants off guard — in most cases, believing the member got the facts wrong, or should have believed your version of events over the landlord's, is generally not enough on its own to support an appeal.
A question of law generally involves something like the LTB misinterpreting or misapplying the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (RTA), applying the wrong legal test, or failing to follow a legal requirement of procedural fairness. Our guide on appealing to the Divisional Court: what counts as a question of law explains this distinction in much greater depth, and it is worth reading closely before deciding whether an appeal is realistic in your situation.
Disagreeing with the outcome, or believing the member made the wrong factual finding, is generally not sufficient grounds for a Divisional Court appeal. The appeal generally needs to identify a specific error of law in how the LTB applied or interpreted the legislation.
The deadline to appeal an LTB order to the Divisional Court is generally short and strictly applied, so this is usually the first thing to confirm once you've decided to consider an appeal.
Before filing anything, it generally helps enormously to be able to state, in a sentence or two, exactly what legal error you believe the LTB made.
Some tenants assume that any outcome they feel was "unfair" can be appealed. In most cases, the Divisional Court's role is narrow — it is generally not a second chance to re-argue the facts, and an appeal limited to disagreeing with credibility findings is unlikely to succeed.
Once you've confirmed the deadline and identified a genuine question of law, the next step is generally filing the formal Notice of Appeal with the Divisional Court.
Filing an appeal generally does not automatically pause or "stay" the LTB's order — for example, an eviction order can generally still be enforced while an appeal is pending unless a stay is specifically granted.
Filing the initial Notice of Appeal is generally only the first stage — an appeal then generally needs to be "perfected" by assembling the formal record and written arguments within further deadlines.
Given the procedural complexity at this stage, retaining a lawyer, even if only to assist with perfecting the appeal, is generally strongly advisable.
Once the appeal is filed and perfected, it generally proceeds to a hearing before one or more judges of the Divisional Court, who will review the question(s) of law raised and the LTB's record. The court generally has a range of options available, including dismissing the appeal, allowing it and sending the matter back to the LTB for a new hearing, or, in some cases, substituting its own decision. This process generally takes significantly longer than the original LTB proceeding, often many months.
Throughout this period, it's important to stay aware of what, if anything, remains enforceable from the original LTB order, particularly if no stay was granted — our LTB orders and enforcement guide explains how enforcement of the underlying order generally works in the meantime.
Several recurring issues tend to undermine Divisional Court appeals from LTB orders.
Generally 30 days from the date the order was issued, though this is worth confirming against the specific order, since extensions are not guaranteed and are granted only in limited circumstances.
Generally, no. An appeal is limited to a question of law, so disagreeing with how the facts were decided is usually not enough on its own to support an appeal.
Generally, something like the LTB misinterpreting the RTA, applying the wrong legal test, or failing a requirement of procedural fairness, rather than a dispute about which witness was more believable.
Not automatically. A separate request for a stay of the order is generally needed to pause enforcement while the appeal is pending, and a stay is not guaranteed to be granted.
It is not strictly required, but given the procedural complexity and the narrow legal standard involved, retaining a lawyer or paralegal is generally strongly advisable for this type of appeal.
This varies considerably, but the process generally takes significantly longer than the original LTB proceeding, often extending many months once transcripts, the record, and written arguments are factored in.
Generally, the court can send the matter back to the LTB for a new hearing, or in some cases substitute its own decision, depending on the nature of the legal error found.
Yes, a request to review is a separate, generally faster process available in narrower circumstances, and in some cases it may be more appropriate than an appeal, depending on the nature of the concern.
A transcript is generally a written record of what was said at the LTB hearing. It is often needed to support an appeal, particularly where the question of law relates to how the hearing itself was conducted, though its necessity depends on the specific grounds raised.
In most cases, missing the deadline closes off the appeal unless the court grants an extension of time, which is generally only allowed in limited circumstances and is not something to rely on.
Fill out the form and an independent landlord-tenant lawyer may reach out to offer a free consultation about your situation.