How to Respond to an N8 Notice (End of Term)
Your options before the hearing when a landlord wants to end your tenancy at the end of a term.
Your options before the hearing when a landlord wants to end your tenancy at the end of a term.
An N8 is a Notice to End a Tenancy at the End of the Term, and a landlord generally uses it when relying on grounds tied to your conduct or circumstances — such as persistent late payment of rent, repeated interference with other tenants, or significant damage — but timed to end at the conclusion of your current rental period or lease term rather than sooner. Because it's timed to the end of the term, an N8 typically requires a longer notice period than some other notices, generally at least 60 days before the term's end for a monthly tenancy.
An N8 does not end your tenancy by itself. Like other termination notices, it generally has to be followed by an L2 application and, in most cases, a hearing before the LTB can issue an order. Understanding which specific ground the landlord is relying on is the most useful first step, since it shapes everything else about how you respond.
Receiving an N8 does not mean your tenancy will automatically end at the term's conclusion. In most cases, the landlord still has to prove the underlying claim at an LTB hearing before any order is issued.
Read the notice carefully to see exactly what it alleges:
Confirm the notice gives you at least the minimum period required — generally at least 60 days before the end of the current term or rental period for most tenancies — and that the termination date actually lines up with the end of a rental period rather than an arbitrary date. If the termination date doesn't match the end of your term or rental period, or doesn't provide the minimum notice, that may be a defect worth raising, though it's generally not a strategy to rely on alone, since the landlord may still be able to serve a corrected notice.
Mark the termination date on your own calendar as soon as you receive the notice, along with a reminder to check, closer to that date, whether the landlord has actually filed an L2 application. Some landlords serve an N8 and then don't follow through with filing, in which case the tenancy generally just continues as before, but you won't know that for certain until the date has passed and you've confirmed nothing further has been filed.
Build your own record of what actually happened:
It's also worth thinking about how many separate incidents the notice actually points to, since a pattern claim generally needs more than one or two isolated events spread far apart. If your own records show the issue was limited, resolved quickly each time, or tied to a specific identifiable cause rather than a broader pattern, that context can matter a great deal at a hearing, so it's worth capturing in writing well before the hearing date arrives.
Depending on what you find, your realistic options generally include:
Some tenants assume that because an N8 is tied to the end of a term, it's treated more leniently than other notices. In most cases the LTB still requires the landlord to prove the specific ground relied on, regardless of the notice's timing.
If the notice period passes and the tenancy hasn't otherwise ended, the landlord's next step is generally to file an L2 application with the LTB. This doesn't end your tenancy automatically — in most cases, a hearing will be scheduled where an adjudicator weighs evidence from both sides. You'll generally receive notice of the application and the hearing date, which gives you further time to prepare, gather additional evidence, or try to resolve the issue directly with the landlord.
During this waiting period, continuing to live in the unit as normal and keeping up with rent and other obligations is generally advisable, since it helps show the LTB that the issue described in the notice, if accurate at all, isn't ongoing. If the landlord's application takes some time to be scheduled, use that time productively rather than assuming nothing can be done until the hearing date arrives.
If a hearing is scheduled, focus your preparation on the specific claim:
Ignoring the notice because it's timed months away, rather than treating the response window as starting immediately, is a common and avoidable mistake — the time before a hearing is exactly when gathering evidence and considering your options matters most. Tenants also sometimes assume that a single late payment or minor issue can't realistically support a "persistent" claim, without checking the actual pattern the landlord is relying on, which can lead to being caught off guard at the hearing. Waiting until the hearing itself to raise context or an explanation — rather than communicating it to the landlord in writing beforehand — generally makes that explanation less credible and harder to establish with evidence. Finally, failing to confirm whether the notice actually reflects the end of your real term or rental period can result in missing a potentially valid technical objection.
An N8 is generally used when a landlord wants to end a tenancy at the conclusion of a term or rental period based on grounds such as persistent late payment, damage, or other ongoing issues.
The LTB generally looks for a pattern over time rather than a single or occasional late payment. Our guide comparing non-payment and persistent late payment explains the distinction further.
Generally at least 60 days before the end of the current term or rental period for most tenancies, timed to align with that end date.
No. The landlord generally still needs to file an L2 application and, in most cases, succeed at a hearing before any order to end the tenancy is made.
Yes, you can present context and evidence at a hearing. Whether a few late payments amount to a "persistent" pattern depends on the specific facts.
The landlord may file an L2 application, which generally leads to a hearing where both sides can present evidence before any order is made.
Generally, yes. Continuing to pay rent on time and in full is usually advisable and can help demonstrate the issue has been addressed going forward.
In many cases, yes. Some landlords are open to resolving the underlying issue directly, which can avoid the need for a hearing altogether.
This may be worth raising, as it can affect the notice's validity, though the landlord may be able to correct the issue with a new notice in some circumstances.
Resolving the issue doesn't automatically void an N8 the way some N7 grounds allow, but it can be a strong point to raise at a hearing about whether an order should still be made.
Generally, yes, particularly if the claim spans multiple incidents or a long period. A paralegal, lawyer, or legal clinic can help assess your specific situation.
Fill out the form and an independent landlord-tenant lawyer may reach out to offer a free consultation about your situation.